+1

I checked out Kudu's source tagged with 1.13.0-RC2 from
https://github.com/apache/kudu git mirror and built it on CentOS7 in
RELEASE configuration.

$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)

Build and all C++ tests passed successfully.

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 441

Label Time Summary:
no_dist_test    =  30.56 sec
no_tsan         =   7.18 sec

Total Test time (real) = 3507.52 sec


Thanks,
-Bankim.


On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:19 PM Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> I checked out Kudu's source tagged with 1.13.0-RC2 from
> https://github.com/apache/kudu git mirror and built it on CentOS6 in
> RELEASE configuration.  I installed binaries at a 6-node cluster, and ran a
> test workload of inserting 4B rows and then upserting them using tens of
> Kudu C++ clients.  All worked as expected.
>
> I checked out Kudu's source tagged with 1.13.0-RC2 from
> https://github.com/apache/kudu git mirror and built it on CentOS Linux
> release 8.2.2004 (Core) in DEBUG configuration.  Ran tests with ctest -j4,
> and got the following stats:
>
> 99% tests passed, 6 tests failed out of 441
>
> Label Time Summary:
> no_dist_test    =  46.06 sec*proc (3 tests)
> no_tsan         =  12.11 sec*proc (3 tests)
>
> Total Test time (real) = 5067.18 sec
>
> The following tests FAILED:
>         109 - client-stress-test (Failed)
>         111 - consistency-itest (Failed)
>         214 - webserver-crawl-itest (Failed)
>         217 - minidump_generation-itest (Failed)
>         223 - master-test (Failed)
>         231 - mini_ranger-test (Failed)
>
> Out of the failed tests, mini_ranger-test failed due to the long startup
> times of Ranger, and I posted a small patch to increase Ranger start
> timeout (the test passed with the patch).  The rest failed due to a timeout
> while negotiating a connection because of DNS resolution failures:
>
>   913 09:35:43.932912 2169799 net_util.cc:413] Time spent look up canonical
> hostname for localhost 'xxx-wifi': real 10.014s  user 0.000s     sys 0.000s
>
> Once I fixed the name resolution issue, the tests passed with no issues.
>
> I also successfully built Kudu at macOS HighSierra in debug configuration.
> I ran 'ctest -j4': the majority of tests passed.  Some tests failed, but I
> guess that's not a release stopper because macOS is a developer-only
> platform for Kudu (IIRC, we haven't had all tests passing on macOS for a
> long time).
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Alexey
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:09 PM Attila Bukor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello Kudu devs!
> >
> > The Apache Kudu team is happy to announce the second release candidate
> for
> > Apache Kudu 1.13.0.
> >
> > Apache Kudu 1.13.0 is a minor release that offers many improvements and
> > fixes
> > since Apache Kudu 1.12.0.
> >
> > This is a source-only release. The artifacts have been staged here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kudu/1.13.0-RC2/
> >
> > Java convenience binaries in the form of a Maven repository are staged
> > here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekudu-1085
> >
> > Linux (built on CentOS 6) and macOS (built on Catalina) test-only Kudu
> > binary
> > JAR artifacts are staged here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekudu-1087
> >
> > It is tagged in Git as 1.13.0-RC2 and signed with my key (found in the
> > KEYS file
> > below). Its commit hash is b4e0ad597fd9a88d63fa524e37141426a28c406a, you
> > can
> > check it out from ASF Gitbox or the official GitHub mirror:
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.13.0-RC2
> > https://github.com/apache/kudu/releases/tag/1.13.0-RC2
> >
> > The KEYS file to verify the artifact and tag signatures can be found
> here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/kudu/KEYS
> >
> > The release notes can be found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/kudu/blob/1.13.0-RC2/docs/release_notes.adoc
> >
> > I'd suggest going through the release notes, building Kudu, and running
> > the unit
> > tests. Testing out the Maven repo would also be appreciated. Also, it's
> > worth
> > running Kudu Java tests against kudu-binary JAR artifact as described in
> > the
> > commit message here:
> >
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;a=commit;h=8a6faaa93f3e206ac75e8087731daccaf7ab646a
> >
> > The vote will run until a majority[1] is achieved, but at least until
> > Wednesday
> > Sep 16th 9:00:00 CEST 2020, which is a bit over the suggested 72 hours
> due
> > to
> > the weekend, to give everyone a chance to review this release candidate
> and
> > vote.
> >
> > Thank You,
> > Attila
> >
> > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to