Hey JD, I'll start taking a look at KUDU-1380. I'd also like to get the Flume sink committed (it's under review but almost there) and get KUDU-1377 into 0.8 as well (I almost have a fix ready but it's not quite done).
Mike On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Todd, > > Thanks for all the testing! > > @Dan B, you handling KUDU-1379? > > @Mike P, since you were in that part of the code recently, can you make > some time for KUDU-1380? > > And regarding the list of things I said I wanted to pull in, partition > pruning made it in and the Java client's new KuduPredicate looks almost > ready. The Get API didn't see any action since the 11th, so I'm inclined to > drop it from 0.8.0. > > I'm writing the release notes, should be up soon. > > J-D > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I discovered a couple bad issues over the weekend that I think we should > > prioritize to get in for 0.8: > > > > - KUDU-1379 - this is a regression blocker where column range predicates > on > > float/double/bool columns no longer work. We should either fix this or > > revert the predicate changes that Dan committed last week (preferably > just > > fix it, since I dont think it's too hard) > > - KUDU-1380 - this is not a regression but it's a case where we can get > > silently wrong results (duplicated rows) from the C++ scanner. Since > it's a > > correctness issue I marked it as blocker. Does anyone have time to look > at > > this today/tomorrow? If not I will try to take a look. > > > > -Todd > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > I just went through the Blocker and Critical jiras targeted for 0.8.0 > and > > > moved a bunch that I knew wouldn't get done in time. Once I branch I'll > > > bulk move the rest. In most cases it's fine to bring them back into > > 0.8.0, > > > as long as it can be done by midweek next week. In doubt, poke me in > the > > > jira. > > > > > > J-D > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey devs, > > > > > > > > It's almost time for 0.8.0, I'd like to get a first RC out in a week > on > > > > April 1st (but more realistically it might happen the 4th). I will > > create > > > > the branch on March 30th. > > > > > > > > The release note-worthy items that have been committed since 0.7.0 > that > > > > aren't in 0.7.1: > > > > - RPC and application feature flags > > > > - KUDU-1337 Avoid spurious remote bootstraps on DeleteTablet() > > > > - Fixed the Spark shutdown bug > > > > - KUDU-1322 failover writes on tablet not found in the C++ client > > > > - KUDU-969. Fix handling of crashes just before tablet metadata > flush > > > > - KUDU-1354. Writes should not release locks before committing MVCC > > > > - master: don't expose intermediate CreateTable() state to consumers > > > > > > > > The things that are still in flight that I really want to get in: > > > > - Partition pruning in the C++ client and improvements on the > > > > server-side. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/2413/ > > > > - [java-client] implement ColumnPredicate API > > > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/2591/ > > > > - KUDU-1235. Add Get API http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/2519/ > > > > > > > > Anything else that comes in is gravy, but I think the scan token API > > > > integration in the Java client needs more thinking. I think Dan is > > > supposed > > > > to send an email to dev@ about it. > > > > > > > > What do you devs think? > > > > > > > > J-D > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > >
