Dan Burkert has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: design-docs: multi-master for 1.0 release
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(1 comment)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/2527/4/docs/design-docs/multi-master-1.0.md
File docs/design-docs/multi-master-1.0.md:

Line 317: A batched logical operation includes one table entry and *N* tablet 
entries,
        : where *N* is the number of tablets in the table. When *N* is very 
large, it
        : is possible for the batch size to exceed the maximum size of a Kudu
        : RPC. This effect was measured in the creation of a table with 1000 
tablets
        : and a simple three-column schema: the Write RPC clocked in at ~117 
KB, a far
        : cry from the 8 MB maximum RPC size. Thus, a batch-based approach 
should not
        : be unreasonable for today's scale targets.
I'm having trouble following this.  First it says when N is very large it could 
be a problem, then it says it isn't a problem?  I thought we had already 
observed it could be a problem.

Second, I think this is talking about the size of the CreateTableRequestPB?  In 
that case, it's more accurate to say that the RPC size is affected by the 
number of range splits, not the total number of tablets (e.g. a table create 
RPC with a billion tablets via hash buckets is the same size as a 1 tablet 
table RPC).


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/2527
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iad76012977a45370b72a04d608371cecf90442ef
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Adar Dembo <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Ribeiro Alves <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jean-Daniel Cryans
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to