Yeah that's good you caught it! +1 for the cherry-pick.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Another blocker that needs to be incorporated:
> http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3208/
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Those look good Todd, I added some comments to that effect in the
> reviews.
> >
> > J-D
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a bunch of small fixes and improvements that I'd like to get
> into
> > > 0.9. For those that are already committed to master, I created
> > cherry-pick
> > > gerrits for them on 0.9.x (
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/q/status:open+project:kudu+branch:branch-0.9.x
> > > should be an up-to-date list)
> > >
> > > There are a few that are still in review that I would like to get in:
> > >
> > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3092/ (improvement to rpcz metrics
> > for
> > > diagnosing timeouts, etc)
> > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3186/ (perf improvement based on
> > YCSB
> > > benchmarks)
> > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3185/ (get rid of log spew for
> queue
> > > overflows, improved 99th percentile latency a lot)
> > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3184/ (java client exponential
> > backoff
> > > - also based on YCSB and some more cluster testing)
> > >
> > > Some others which are not my own patches but I think are worth
> > considering:
> > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3142/ (NaN fix by Will, seems low
> > > risk)
> > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3013/ (Resource Metrics, by Zhen -
> > > this
> > > is an improvement rather than fix, so maybe won't make it, but would be
> > > nice since Zhen's been working on it a while)
> > >
> > > Lastly, I just filed this usability issue which is also causing 10%+
> > > flakiness on client-test:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1466
> > > .
> > > I'm hoping this will be a pretty short fix of just a few lines of code,
> > in
> > > which case I think it's a good candidate for 0.9.0.
> > >
> > > -Todd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Got it, Mike. One thing that worries me is that there's a lot of
> > > > testing/documentation still needed for both and we're getting close
> to
> > > > release. If you find yourself short on time, my suggestion would be
> to
> > > > focus on one and to make sure it's extra solid.
> > > >
> > > > Other patches I'm +1 on cherry-picking:
> > > >
> > > > Upsert support in Flume: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3157/
> > > > Minimal client changes to support non-covering range partitioned
> > tables:
> > > > http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3177/
> > > > Remove default partitioning:
> http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3131/
> > > >
> > > > I'll also be cherry-picking a bunch of other patches myself.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > J-D
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mike Percy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have a couple patches in flight that I'd like to get into 0.9.0:
> > > > >
> > > > >    - http://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3135/
> > > > >    - http://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/3076/
> > > > >
> > > > > They both need more work but I think in both cases it's doable this
> > > week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'll send the list of pre-authorized patches/jiras that can go in
> > > that
> > > > > > branch later today, else please ping me on this thread or add me
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > review.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > J-D
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Todd Lipcon
> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

Reply via email to