Sure, why not. Let me post a question. On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:09 AM, hongbin ma <[email protected]> wrote:
> shall we drop by the Cassandra community and ask them if they have a plan > to support coprocessor-like feature? this is quite normal requirement, and > should not be too difficult for them, HBase was not born with coprocessor, > I believe. > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Li Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Not for the core team at least. Cassandra lacks of a CoProcessor > equivalent > > (the last time I checked). > > > > However it is highly welcome if some one want to do a Proof of Concept in > > this direction. Not limited to Cassandra, consider Kudu and other K-V > store > > options. If a PoC shows another storage can be much faster than HBase, we > > are more than willing to adopt. > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:02 AM, KylinPOC <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Is Cassandra on the road map for cube storage as an option to HBase? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://apache-kylin-incubating.74782.x6.nabble.com/Cassandra-instead-of-HBase-in-Kylin-tp2688.html > > > Sent from the Apache Kylin (Incubating) mailing list archive at > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾* > Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io > Github: https://github.com/binmahone >
