Hi Luke - thanks for your response! It seems that branch 1.1 is a bit behind the master (last commit ~1 month ago) - is there any plan to keep it in sync with the master on regular basis?
Thanks, Marek 2015-12-17 13:36 GMT+01:00 Luke Han <luke...@gmail.com>: > There's one branch supports HBase 1.x already, please checkout and build > binrary package. > > Start from Kylin 2.x release, we will support HBase 1.x as default, but > will also have another branch to support HBase 0.98.x version. > > For user to easy download and try, I think we may should generate package > for HBase 0.98.x and 1.x both. > > Thanks. > > > Best Regards! > --------------------- > > Luke Han > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Marek Wiewiorka < > marek.wiewio...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > That's right - key players: Cloudera and Hortonworks ship their distros > > with HBase 1.0 or 1.1. > > Up-to-date HBase 1.1 branch would definitely boost Kylin adoption and I > > think should be treated as high-priority. > > > > > > > > 2015-12-16 18:00 GMT+01:00 Randy Gelhausen <rgel...@gmail.com>: > > > > > +1 to this question. Many new Hadoop installs are using HBase 1.1+ > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Marek Wiewiorka < > > > marek.wiewio...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Kylin Devs - is there any plan to merge changes from 1.2 branch > into > > > > hbase-1.1? > > > > I can see that hbase-1.1 branch is pretty outdated. > > > > Some HBase-related project like e.g. Apache Phoenix maintain at > least 2 > > > > branches: > > > > hbase-0.98 and hbase-1.1? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Marek > > > > > > > > > >
