Hi all,

I have created a build for Apache Kylin 2.0-alpha, release candidate 1. It
is alpha due to the big amount of new features and improvements accumulated
and I want to be cautious. Yet still it is well tested. Cubes (hundreds of
TB) have been rebuilt and compared with previous version to ensure
correctness and performance improvement.

Changes highlights:

[KYLIN-875] - A plugin-able architecture, to allow alternative cube engine
/ storage engine / data source.
[KYLIN-1245] - A better MR cubing algorithm, about 1.5 times faster than
1.x by comparing hundreds of jobs.
[KYLIN-942] - A better storage engine, makes query roughly 2 times faster
(especially for slow queries) than 1.x by comparing tens of thousands sqls.
[KYLIN-738] - Streaming cubing EXPERIMENTAL support, source from kafka,
build cube in-mem at minutes interval
[KYLIN-943] - TopN pre-calculation (more UDFs coming)
[KYLIN-1065] - ODBC compatible with Tableau 9.1, MS Excel, MS PowerBI
[KYLIN-1219] - Kylin support SSO with Spring SAML


Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. Here’s release
notes:
https://kylin.apache.org/docs/release_notes.html

The commit to be voted upon:
https://github.com/apache/kylin/commit/dc10a38360c4c014dd9853c6bae0d5a2c115c4c5

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kylin/apache-kylin-2.0-alpha-rc1/

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
apache-kylin-2.0-alpha-src.tar.gz.md5   e2d78d1a99e49c7fbdd2aa26d2cf09e5
apache-kylin-2.0-alpha-src.tar.gz.sha1
a29f9623486adb7467bee94056a0403888fdccf5

A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekylin-1018/

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/liyang.asc

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Kylin 2.0-alpha.

The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 PPMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Kylin 1.2
[ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Here is my vote:

+1 (binding)

-- 
Best regards,

Yang

Reply via email to