The output cube must be all the same for all engines. So by design, using different engine for different segment should be fine. However no one has tried that before.
I'm curious about the motivation behind this. What makes you want to do this? Yang On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:10 PM, zhong yanghong <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Team, > > > For cube building, current rule for selecting a cube build engine may not > be perfect for users. Users may want to choose one engine to build cube. > There is one question related to this. Can we support the designation of > build engine at job level? In other words, if we build different segments > belonging to a cube by different engines, will it bring some issue, > especially when users need to merge those segments? > > > If there's no issue, should we provide a restful API for users to do cube > building with the designation of build engine? > > > > Best regards, > > Yanghong Zhong > > Email: [email protected] > > Mobile: +86 13706747741 > > > > >
