JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-1954
thanks for reporting! On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:54 AM, hongbin ma <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you're right on this. > > the code modifies the filter in the first CubeSegmentScanner and won't get > modified in the subsequent CubeSegmentScanners again. Due to the difference > of different segment's dictionaries, it might be wrong. > > I'm opening a JIRA for this and it will be fixed in 1.5.4 > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:53 AM, [email protected] <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> CubeStorageQuery.search/ CubeSegmentScanner >> >> when filter is translated for the first segment, filter is changed to >> CompareTupleFilter(IN clause) >> translate will not triger for the next segments. >> this is not right because dictionary is not same for every segments. >> >> assume data like this: >> >> merchant_name cube segment >> 深海新创专营 20160725 >> 深海新创手机 20160726 >> >> when search with like '%深海新创%' >> CubeSegmentScanner scan segment '20160725' , and filter is changed to in >> clause（ IN '深海新创专营'） >> result is right for this segment ,but not for the next segments because >> filter now has been changed. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-kylin.74782.x6.n >> abble.com/Question-abount-BuildInFunctionTransformer-tp5499p5533.html >> Sent from the Apache Kylin mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾* > -- Regards, *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾*
