I’m sorry for too long not maintain it!

I agree with liyang to give a label to the RAW measure “Beta” or others.

I will improve it when I have time!

2016-12-19 10:21 GMT+08:00 Li Yang <[email protected]>:

> Or display the Raw with "Beta" or "Experimental" to warn user that it is
> not a mature feature?
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:30 PM, 康凯森 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1.
> > But the "RAW" measure is still some useful, we could improve it next year
> > when we have time.
> >
> >
> > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> > 发件人: "ShaoFeng Shi";<[email protected]>;
> > 发送时间: 2016年12月15日(星期四) 中午12:05
> > 收件人: "dev"<[email protected]>;
> >
> > 主题: [Discuss] Disable/hide "RAW" measure in Kylin web GUI
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello developers and users,
> >
> > I have a proposal want to disucss here, which is about the "RAW" measure
> in
> > Kylin.
> >
> > The RAW measure was developed to solve the requirement for getting raw
> data
> > when user drill down from high level to low levels. It's performance
> would
> > be much better than fetching from source like Hive, so some users like
> it.
> > This blog introduces it:
> > https://kylin.apache.org/blog/2016/05/29/raw-measure-in-kylin/
> >
> > While it has some limitations:
> > 1) always use dictionary encoding, which means it couldn't support UHC;
> > since raw columns usually be transaction IDs, numbers, etc, the building
> > cost is much higher than ordinary dimensions;
> > 2) the raw messages for a dimension combination are persisted in one big
> > cell,; When too many rows dumped in one cell, will get BufferOverflow
> > error. This couldn't be predicted, so for an modeler or analyst he
> doesn't
> > know whether this feature could work when he creates the cube.
> > 3) seems no people maintains it;
> >
> > Based on above, I propose hiding this measure on Web GUI by default, so
> > avoiding confusing user; If someone hear and want to use this, he still
> can
> > enable it by simply set in kylin.properties.
> >
> > Any input is welcomed.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
> >
>

Reply via email to