I hope Ted's suggestion did not fall to deaf ears. We do not need to cc or plus anybody for conversations in dev@ list. Julian is already subscribed to this list.
And diversity should involve individuals not just from MapR, Cloudera, or HW. - Henry On Monday, January 12, 2015, Manjunatha Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > + Julian > > On 1/12/15, 12:58 PM, "Adunuthula, Seshu" <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >On Diversity goal for Kylin would like to explicitly call out MapR¹s > >Involvement and commitment for Kylin and Drill Integration and > >specifically > >Ted¹s contribution on guiding Kylin with the Apache Way. > > > >Hoping to see similar commitment from Hortonworks and Cloudera. > > > >On 1/12/15, 8:07 AM, "Adunuthula, Seshu" <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >>Luke, > >> > >>Some thoughts before we tag Kylin as V1.0. We should spend some time on > >>the fundamentals of Kylin > >> > >>1. Availability: Build out the DR capability in Kylin. We have an option > >>to DR both the offline Cube > >>Build/Refreshes or only the Cube Store (HBase). The cheaper choice would > >>be to DR the Cube Store (HBase) > >>By creating a Async Replication Instance of HBase on a different Colo. > >> > >>2. Security: Currently the Kylin Cube security model inherits from the > >>underlying Hive metadata. This > >>Needs enhancing if we plan to get data from sources other than Hive. > >>Kylin > >>should have its own security > >>Model independent of Hive and we should consider integration with the > >>security solutions out there > >>Knox/Sentry/Ranger etc. > >> > >>3. Performance: We have internal performance numbers, but would like them > >>validated with externally > >>Recognizable benchmarks such as TPC-DS. > >> > >>4. Diversity: I would like us to focus on diversity of committers and > >>deployments as the final criteria > >>For the V1 release. > >> > >>Ron and Manju, > >> > >>Would like commitment from Cloudera and Hortonworks towards moving the > >>needle on Kylin especially > >>On Fundamentals such as Security and Performance. > >> > >>Regards > >>Seshu Adunuthula > >> > >> > >>PS: How come Apache DL emails are still in the 90s. Some formatting in > >>the > >>emails would be nice :-) > >> > >> > >>On 1/11/15, 6:52 AM, "Luke Han" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >>>After open sourced, there are a lot conversion with customers, partners > >>>and > >>>also received many feedback from external, community and others. Combine > >>>all information we have and considering our bandwidth so far, we drafted > >>>this release plan as below: > >>> > >>>https://www.dropbox.com/sc/nh90bniy7szyvta/AACuv2O3pO1Fog6RwQFfr6YIa > >>> > >>>Here are summary: > >>> > >>> - v1.0 (MOLAP), current version to be released with more stable and > >>>bug > >>> fixed. So far there's no majority issue. Target release date: > >>>2015-01-15 > >>> - v1.1, release via Apache process, target release date: 2015-01-31 > >>> - v1.x, bug fix and enhance, soon be merged to HOLAP > >>> - v2.0 (HOLAP), introduced InvertedIndex, since there are totally > >>> different design and concept, we name this release as 2.0, target > >>>release > >>> date: 2015-03-31 > >>> - v2.3, Capacity management and Automation > >>> - v2.5 (Streaming Cube Builder), introduce Streaming Cube Builder > >>> capability in this release > >>> - v2.x, Spark & SparkSQL support, target release date: 2015-06-30 > >>> > >>> > >>>Please let's know if there any problem and reply here to discuss. > >>> > >>>Thank you very much > >>> > >>>Luke > >> > > > >
