I am still seeing large merged commits going into the Kylin source. This is a serious problem on several grounds:
1) the source of these commits is obscured by the bulk nature of the commits. The source needs to be identified down to the person who wrote the code so that the project can be sure that all contributions were licensed correctly. 2) the JIRA's that these commits are associated with is not recorded. This is important because the community needs a record of what code was written for what purpose. 3) the community is not apparently being involved in reviewing these commits. That raises all kinds of flags about development proceeding off the mailing list. These concerns are very serious relative to the Apache standards for projects.
