Actually it will not depend on jenkins. it only leverages maven's provided tools.
maven-failsafe-plugin is exactly what maven provided for running integration tests On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:57 PM, 周千昊 <[email protected]> wrote: > sounds like a good choice to seperate UT and integration test. > only one concern is that it depends heavily on jenkins, maybe it will have > some extra cost for developers. > I heard that there are some maven plugin can do the similar thing, such as > maven-failsafe-plugin. > anyway, seperating the UT and integration test is the right thing to do. > Let's take a look at these different solutions to see which one is the best > for us. > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:27 PM hongbin ma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi,guys, > > > > > > Please help to review at my proposal here: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-697 > > > > This will solve some of our existing issues, > > > > And will make our test cases more professional. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾* > > Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io > > Github: https://github.com/binmahone > > > -- Regards, *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾* Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io Github: https://github.com/binmahone
