Hmm..Interesting. From what I browsed, I thought Mondrian is a DMX based
OLAP tool. Since kylin is SQL based, how did you get it working (at least.
Unstably)? Thanks for your time.
On May 19, 2015 12:52 AM, "Jakob Stengård" <[email protected]> wrote:

> You could use Mondrian with kylin as backend, maybe.
>
> I tried it a few months ago. Didn't work so well then, but maybe kylin is
> more stable now.
>
> Best Regards
> Jakob Stengard
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Sarnath <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I agree. SQL is more commonplace than MDX.
> >
> > However, Sometimes MDX is hidden under an OLAP tool... The end-user may
> > never know it. And having MDX support would make sure Kylin connects to
> > several existing BI tools out of the box...
> >
> > Actually, I was doing a simple aggregator project without realizing I was
> > into OLAP. And then I started reading up and found Kylin - which kind of
> > already does what I was thinking to do...and much more... So, I was just
> > wondering if I could serve up my aggregations via MDX/ODBO/XML for
> > Analysis. I believe that would help me to connect the aggregations to
> OLAP
> > tools right away... Do you have any recommendations on how this can be
> > done?
> >
> > Best,
> > Sarnath
> >
> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Han, Luke <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The design thinking behind of this is there could be more cubes to
> serve
> > > different SQLs with same star schema, and only expose Table and SQL to
> > user
> > > is more easy way for people to onboard and learn and integrated with
> any
> > > SQL based tools.
> > >
> > > And, how many usage of MDX compare to SQL? And how many people know SQL
> > > but not MDX:-)
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 发自我的 iPhone
> > >
> > > > 在 2015年5月19日,01:32,Sarnath <[email protected]> 写道:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am very new to Kylin.
> > > >
> > > > From the architecture of Kylin - what I understand is that - Kylin
> does
> > > all
> > > > the aggregations but does not expose the result as multi-dimensional
> > > > database. Instead, it exposes the underlying as a normal relational
> > > > database - but optimizes queries by serving from the aggregations
> > > wherever
> > > > possible....
> > > >
> > > > Is there a reason why Kylin chose not to go with MDX or ODBO...? Did
> it
> > > > choose ODBC only because of Tableau?
> > > >
> > > > Appreciate any clarity on this,
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Best,
> > > > Sarnath
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Med vänlig hälsning (Best Regards)
> *Jakob Stengård*
>

Reply via email to