Hi Sun,
There's no benchmark from our side yet,especially in prod env. I'm also
very curious to know if someone did such comparison.
The direct advantage for Kylin over Impala (include other MPP solution):
1. Non-Invasive Design: you do not need to install any agent, library
or others in your existing Hadoop Cluster (Neither on Namenode or DataNode)
2. Pre-Calculation result avoid runtime scan/aggregation, that mean you
could get result more faster in seconds latency over billions data.
Thanks.
Luke
Best Regards!
---------------------
Luke Han
2015-05-28 10:20 GMT+08:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
> Hi, team
>
> Really interested in the performance comparison and also the native design
> advantage over Apache Kylin
>
> and Cloudera Impala. As the official saying, Cloudera Impala is a
> "Lightning-fast, distributed SQL queries
>
> for petabytes of data stored in Apache Hadoop clusters". Kylin can goes to
> 10-1000x query efficiency over
>
> hive in the usage of MOLAP, while Cloudera Impala can also achieve much
> more performance upgrade over
>
> hive.
>
> Question is : Does Kylin do some benchmark test or performance comparison
> with Cloudera Impala in production
>
> environment? What can be the direct advantage for Apache Kylin over
> Cloudera Impala?
>
> If anyone had deployed and used both products in your usage, please kindly
> share any available suggestions.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sun.
>
>
>
> [email protected]
>
