On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Li Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > I heard concerns on HBase from time to time too, but often from a stability > point of view. > > So what do you guys recommend if to replace HBase and why? > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > That somewhat depends on what you mean by something else. > > > > For MapR-DB, the only difference is lack of support for co-processors. > That > > means that switching from HBase is pretty easy. > > >
I am heavily biased in this matter. My red hat labels me as biased and it says "MapR". I think that MapR DB is an excellent choice as long as the co-processor lack doesn't cause you problems.
