Thank you Li Yang.

1. OK. Cool. Looking forward to discuss about this feature later.

2. I am trying example queries. The exception is not thrown as my expected.
I tried the following queries:

a). SELECT PART_DT FROM kylin_sales;
b). SELECT * FROM sample_07;    # the table sample_07 was imported into
kylin
c). SELECT PART_DT FROM kylin_sales GROUP BY PART_DT;

The case b) and c) can be handle as my expected, the b) threw a exception,
and c) will return correct result set. But, the case a) returned a *empty
result set* without any exception.

So, I am not sure if it is a feature or a bug.

Thanks



On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Li Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1. Creating a cube right from a SQL is charming. Had discussed this idea,
> but never come to implement. A big issue is user still have to learn cube
> concepts, otherwise the auto-generated cube is either too big or the query
> is too slow. Still this is a good idea to bootstrap new users.
>
> 2. Currently Kylin throws exception when no matching cube. You can catch
> the exception in the frontend and guide user to hive query GUI. That's
> perfectly doable, and I believe, very useful too. You may start by calling
> Kylin Restful API from javascript [1], and detect error response that is
> caused by no matching cube.
>
> [1]
> http://kylin.incubator.apache.org/docs/howto/howto_use_restapi_in_js.html
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Leon Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Li Yang for you quick reply.
> >
> > 1. From a newbie's view, create a cube is too complex. How about if user
> > provide a SQL, kylin can automatically generate the model json and cube
> > json?
> >
> > 2. IMHO, SparkSQL can be faster, but, it may still take hours. Can kylin
> > provide such API, that *test* if the query can be handled by any cube. If
> > not, user can *directly* call hive-server2 for slow query?
> >
> > I am willing to hear about detailed advises, so that I can hack Kylin to
> > implement these potential features.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Li Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > 1. You can create a view using the SQL, then let the view be Kylin fact
> > > table and build cube from it.
> > >
> > > 2. Technically yes, but the routing feature is disabled long ago. We
> had
> > > the same re-route idea in early PoC of Kylin. Later it turns out hive
> is
> > > too slow, and when mixed up, a query sometimes returns in seconds,
> > > sometimes in hours, the user experience is very bad. The feature is
> then
> > > disabled and never maintained any more. The idea is still valid, we may
> > > implement when hive speed catches up, or route to some faster SQL
> engine,
> > > like SparkSQL. KYLIN-742 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-742>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Leon Zhang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Kylin Developers,
> > > >
> > > >    I am a newbie to Kylin system. During I investigate this awesome
> > > system,
> > > > these questions come to me:
> > > >
> > > > 1.  Can I build a cube from a SQL? For learn_kylin example, the SQL
> for
> > > > "kylin_cube_sales" is:
> > > >
> > > > ``` sql
> > > >  SELECT
> > > >  FACT_TABLE.PART_DT
> > > > ,FACT_TABLE.LEAF_CATEG_ID
> > > > ,FACT_TABLE.LSTG_SITE_ID
> > > > ,LOOKUP_2.META_CATEG_NAME
> > > > ,LOOKUP_2.CATEG_LVL2_NAME
> > > > ,LOOKUP_2.CATEG_LVL3_NAME
> > > > ,FACT_TABLE.LSTG_FORMAT_NAME
> > > > ,FACT_TABLE.PRICE
> > > > ,FACT_TABLE.SELLER_ID
> > > > FROM DEFAULT.KYLIN_SALES as FACT_TABLE
> > > > INNER JOIN DEFAULT.KYLIN_CAL_DT as LOOKUP_1
> > > > ON FACT_TABLE.PART_DT = LOOKUP_1.CAL_DT
> > > > INNER JOIN DEFAULT.KYLIN_CATEGORY_GROUPINGS as LOOKUP_2
> > > > ON FACT_TABLE.LEAF_CATEG_ID = LOOKUP_2.LEAF_CATEG_ID AND
> > > > FACT_TABLE.LSTG_SITE_ID = LOOKUP_2.SITE_ID
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > > 2. Kylin is super fast, can I route *unmatched* query to slow hive
> > > engine?
> > > > For example, the simple query like "select * from kylin_sales"
> return a
> > > > empty result set. Can I route query like this to the hive engine?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to