integer,

and the cube was built without using dictionaries.

On September 29, 2015 at 5:45:49 AM, hongbin ma ([email protected]) wrote:

interesting observation  

what it the data type of the dimension?  

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Vadim Semenov <[email protected]> wrote:  

> I found something:  
>  
> I executed a query on one partition with a filter on one dimension with  
> two values (70, 200) and got the following in the logs:  
> http://i.imgur.com/b3zthZ3.png  
>  
> You see the scan range and 0 rows in the result set.  
>  
> I tried the same scan in hbase shell and got 0 rows:  
> scan 'KYLIN_JH6RCA65S7', {STARTROW => "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01  
> 2015-09-2670\x09\x09\x09\x09", STOPROW => "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01  
> 2015-09-26200\x09\x09\x09\x00"}  
>  
> then I swapped the start & stop row:  
> scan 'KYLIN_JH6RCA65S7', {STARTROW => "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01  
> 2015-09-26200\x09\x09\x09", STOPROW => "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01  
> 2015-09-2670\x09\x09\x09\x09\x00"}  
> and got 659 rows.  
>  
> And just to confirm I changed the order of the stop & start row in  
> HBaseKeyRange and got the results:  
> http://i.imgur.com/mT0qI4I.png  
>  
> On September 28, 2015 at 11:19:41 PM, Li Yang ([email protected]) wrote:  
> I too cannot reproduce this one. Tried IN() on the LSTG_SITE_ID column of  
> TEST_KYLIN_FACT (the test cube used by regression). Everything is good.  
> The query I used:  
>  
> select LSTG_SITE_ID, sum(price) as GMV  
> from test_kylin_fact  
> inner JOIN edw.test_cal_dt as test_cal_dt  
> ON test_kylin_fact.cal_dt = test_cal_dt.cal_dt  
> where test_cal_dt.week_beg_dt between DATE '2013-09-01' and DATE  
> '2013-10-01' and LSTG_SITE_ID in (0, 3, 15, 23, 100)  
> group by LSTG_SITE_ID  
>  
> Meant to be similar to Vadim's query, has a date condition, and the  
> LSTG_SITE_ID is of int type. Tested many combination of the ID values, all  
> results are correct...  
>  
> Anyone else tried similar queries on 0.7 or 1.x releases?  
>  
>  
>  
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:28 PM, hongbin ma <[email protected]> wrote:  
>  
> > if you could give some sample data only and make sure the issue can be  
> > reproduceable on the sample data  
> >  
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:28 PM, vipul jhawar <[email protected]>  
> > wrote:  
> >  
> > > hi  
> > >  
> > > For the cube  
> > >  
> > > JSON model is  
> > > http://www.jsoneditoronline.org/?id=1da42fe018b14c7522d3937ba81cd37e  
> > > JSON cube is  
> > > http://www.jsoneditoronline.org/?id=97008080361a2388888acd128004753d  
> > >  
> > > On minimal data for the cube, even if we generate it how will we share  
> it  
> > > with you ? or you want sample fact table.  
> > > I can show you the kylin query in play on our current cube which is  
> > hosted  
> > > if you want.  
> > >  
> > > Thanks  
> > >  
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:54 PM, hongbin ma <[email protected]>  
> > wrote:  
> > >  
> > > > Hi,  
> > > >  
> > > > We cannot reproduce it with our test cases.  
> > > >  
> > > > However, we'd love to help to analyze the problem for you. If  
> possible,  
> > > can  
> > > > you please try to use a minimal cube definition(maybe with a little  
> > > sample  
> > > > data) that will pin-point the issue?  
> > > >  
> > > > The cube desc consist of three parts:  
> > > > 1. Cube Desc (json file)  
> > > > 2. Model Desc (json file)  
> > > > 3. Hive table schema  
> > > >  
> > > > the first two files can be checked directly in kylin web, go to  
> "Cubes"  
> > > > tab, click the cube, and checkout contents in "Json(Cube)" and  
> > > > "Json(Model)"  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:11 PM, hongbin ma <[email protected]>  
> > > wrote:  
> > > >  
> > > > > hi vipul  
> > > > >  
> > > > > I'm looking into this  
> > > > >  
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:10 PM, vipul jhawar <  
> > [email protected]>  
> > > > > wrote:  
> > > > >  
> > > > >> hi  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >> Just wanted to check if someone has had a chance to look at this  
> > case.  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >> Thanks  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:33 PM, vipul jhawar <  
> > > [email protected]>  
> > > > >> wrote:  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >> > Hi  
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >> > Please let us know if you need more details on this as it is  
> > > affecting  
> > > > >> the  
> > > > >> > results and its not predictable.  
> > > > >> > We are on 0.7.2  
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >> > Thanks  
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Vadim Semenov <_@  
> databuryat.com  
> > >  
> > > > >> wrote:  
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >> >> Hi,  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> We've found issues while running some queries:  
> > > > >> >> they return inconsistent results, i.e. in some cases we don't  
> get  
> > > any  
> > > > >> >> rows, in some cases we get some rows but never all that we  
> > expected  
> > > > to  
> > > > >> get.  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> I was able to pin-point the queries, so here're the cases:  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> 1. SELECT dim, measure FROM table WHERE partition = one  
> partition  
> > > AND  
> > > > >> dim  
> > > > >> >> IN (a,b,c) GROUP BY dim  
> > > > >> >> We get results for a,c only  
> > > > >> >> http://i.imgur.com/SZu6f2E.png  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> 2. IN (b)  
> > > > >> >> We get results for b as expected  
> > > > >> >> http://i.imgur.com/8c8UMWj.png  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> 3. IN (a,b)  
> > > > >> >> We don't get any results  
> > > > >> >> http://i.imgur.com/qIepe8d.png  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> 4. IN (b,c)  
> > > > >> >> We get results for b,c as expected  
> > > > >> >> http://i.imgur.com/Qq6yuuS.png  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> We tried to run the queries with acceptPartial=false and with  
> > empty  
> > > > >> cache  
> > > > >> >> and the issues are still the same.  
> > > > >> >>  
> > > > >> >> What should we do to debug this?  
> > > > >> >> What might be causing these issues?  
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >  
> > > > >  
> > > > >  
> > > > > --  
> > > > > Regards,  
> > > > >  
> > > > > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾*  
> > > > > Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io  
> > > > > Github: https://github.com/binmahone  
> > > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > --  
> > > > Regards,  
> > > >  
> > > > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾*  
> > > > Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io  
> > > > Github: https://github.com/binmahone  
> > > >  
> > >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > --  
> > Regards,  
> >  
> > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾*  
> > Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io  
> > Github: https://github.com/binmahone  
> >  
>  



--  
Regards,  

*Bin Mahone | 马洪宾*  
Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io  
Github: https://github.com/binmahone  

Reply via email to