Not in 1.1; Here is the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-1014
I tried to do some search weeks ago, but didn't finish; If you have any
comment, welcome to input there;

2015-10-15 13:00 GMT+08:00 Abhilash L L <[email protected]>:

> Is this part of any kylin release ?
>
> Regards,
> Abhilash
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Li Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Can keep the config until we know how to detect from hadoop conf.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:11 PM, yu feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I can not find the property in hadoop conf files, maybe user must
> specify
> > > it..
> > >
> > > 2015-09-14 13:53 GMT+08:00 Li Yang <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > Nice improvement!
> > > >
> > > > One question, could kerberos authentication be defected from hadoop
> > conf?
> > > > I don't want to add a kylin config to describe something already
> > defined
> > > in
> > > > hadoop config.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:03 PM, yu feng <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have used kylin-0.7.2 build cube and do some query, and I am
> trying
> > > > > kylin-1.0 in another hadoop cluster. I get this problem below in
> > > > > kylin-0.7.2 and kylin-1.0 :
> > > > >
> > > > > Our hadoop cluster deals with authentication with kerberos,
> However,
> > We
> > > > > find after submit a mapreduce job(the second step in building
> cube),
> > > > kylin
> > > > > will send a http request to RM server and get the job status at
> > regular
> > > > > intervals, But we always get errors here because kylin do nothing
> > about
> > > > > kerberos. Finally , we do some change on source code and make it
> > > support
> > > > > kerberos authentication . attachment is my patch file..
> > > > >
> > > > > I add a property named "kylin.job.status.with.kerberos" which means
> > if
> > > we
> > > > > need do authentication with kerberos when getting status from RM,
> the
> > > > > default value is false.
> > > > >
> > > > > It will be highly appreciated if you have some good idea or
> > > > > some suggestion. Thanks...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to