make sense, most of dev should happen in separate branches; only when it is stable and passed test, it can be merged back to staging.
On 11/3/15, 10:30 AM, "hongbin ma" <[email protected]> wrote: >my understanding: > >staging branch seems to be the right name, because now and then we use it >to test&deploy > >dev branch should refer to feature branches like KYLIN-942,etc where a >specific feature is under development > >On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Luke Han <[email protected]> wrote: > >> how about to change "staging" to "dev" to bring more sense for >>community? >> >> >> >> >> Best Regards! >> --------------------- >> >> Luke Han >> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:07 AM, ShaoFeng Shi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > FYI: to control the branch numbers, we just deleted the obsolate "1.x" >> > branch. Please checkout "1.x-staging" for latest 1.x development code, >> and >> > checkout "master" for latest stable release. >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Shaofeng Shi >> > >> > > > >-- >Regards, > >*Bin Mahone | 马洪宾* >Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io >Github: https://github.com/binmahone
