Try Marathon then.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Luke Han <[email protected]> wrote: > Run on YARN requires to run kylin on "one" Hadoop cluster. > > Based on today's practices, Kylin's services always sit beside clusters not > inside to have capability to interactive with more than 2 clusters with > just one Kylin deployment. > > > > > > > Best Regards! > --------------------- > > Luke Han > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Why dont we just leverage Hadoop YARN? > > > > We could use Apache Twill [1] to wrap it as YARN application. > > > > Helix is great but one of the limitations it could not provision new > > node when not already available. > > > > [1] http://twill.incubator.apache.org/ > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:01 PM, 周千昊 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, all > > > Kylin currently manages the cluster itself, so far it works fine > > since > > > there are only 2 roles for the cluster, job engine and query engine. > > > In order to reduce the complexity of deployment and support the > > coming > > > streaming feature, I suggest kylin have a better cluster management. > > > There are several candidates I think can be leveraged. Apache > Helix > > > seem suitable for Kylin in my opinion. > > > I would love to start a discussion about cluster manager of Kylin, > > how > > > we can do it the better way, and which component we should choose. > > >
