Agree with the context of what you are saying and my comment about "the
thread has to stop" was probably overboard.

In my defense threads I have usually seen threads like these ³X is better
than Y² dissolve into unproductive discussions, but I agree that we have
not reached that state here yet.

Seshu 

On 11/18/15, 9:09 AM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected]> wrote:

>PS [1] http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
>> On Nov 18, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 18, 2015, at 5:13 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu <[email protected]>
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think this thread has reached its level of usefulness and should
>>>stop.
>> 
>> If I may, a point about email etiquette. And by ³etiquette² I don¹t
>>mean to imply that anyone was being impolite. It¹s just that there are
>>ways to maximize the efficiency of a conversation (and the valuable time
>>of everyone in the community) without stifling discussion.
>> 
>> This thread does not need to stop. But Seshu is at liberty to ignore
>>it, or to point out that it is not where his priorities lie. There may
>>well be others in the community who are interested in Sarnath¹s proposal
>>and would like to help.
>> 
>> I also understand the sub-text: that Seshu works for a company that is
>>a major contributor of resources to Kylin. While we leave our corporate
>>affiliations at the door in Apache, I think it is fine to signal, as
>>Seshu did, that the priorities of that team lie elsewhere. I¹d rather
>>that such communication occur here than in some back-channel.
>> 
>> A big touch-point for me is Eric Raymond¹s ³How to ask questions the
>>smart way²[1]. A common theme is that it is OK to ignore questions that
>>are inappropriate. Ignoring questions is a great way to deal with
>>trolls, fools and time-wasters.
>> 
>> In my opinion, the only time when someone should be asked to stop
>>posting is when they have grossly breached the standards of the
>>community: personal attacks, rudeness. For anything less, let the thread
>>continue. If no one has the time or interest to reply to it, it will
>>quickly peter out.
>> 
>> Julian
>> 

Reply via email to