From: Ain Vagula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:55:38 +0200
> If we are editing manually po-files only, question is how should
> msgmerge handle this when we are updating po-files with latest
> pot-files. I have tried this, kde-style msgids in po-s are of course
> not preserved, when in pot files strings are not unified, that means
> we should separate strings in pot file... as pot file is generated
> from sdf with every new milestone, it will be very annoying to do this
> manually every time ;)
Editing POT is nonsense, of course.
> I will stay at my opinion, having the white-list (if this is possible
You resigned so early? If David adds pot2po, this could be solved much
efficiently.
--
Pavel Janík
The Internet is not a primary goal for PC usage.
-- Bill Gates, 1995
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
