On 10.10.2006 20:40, Andre Schnabel wrote: > > Please read GPL license, ( from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html ) : > > 2. b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in > > whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part > > thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties > > under the terms of this License. > > I'm not a lawyer, but having a dictionary under GPL within the > installation set would (imo) fullfill the condition "... that in whole > or in part contains ... the Program or any part thereof ...". This would > imply that you would need to change the license for the complete package > to GPL. > This might be possible for the OOo Source code itself (it's possible to > distribute LGPL'ed code under GPL) but I don't think, anybody had a look > at all implications. > > (If anybody could give me a written statement by FSF, that this kind of > file inlcusion would not cause a need for relicensing, I'd be happy ;-) )
Well, when lang packages for linux are 3. So I think 4th package with dictionaries install will not break this. It will be separate and the lang packs still will work without the 4th. -- Hristo Simeonov Hristov Leader of OpenOffice.org - Bulgarian GnuPG key 0xD0D895EB: 0282 D8D0 90D3 963F E57E B0A7 2670 88D9 D0D8 95EB --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
