Hi Friedel,
F Wolff 쓴 글:
Op Dinsdag 2007-11-13 skryf Aijin Kim:
Hi Jordi,
Aijin,
There are a few translators that cannot use our Pootle server because
it is at port 32300. Many people at their work places and universities
have firewalls that block the access for this kind of ports.
My suggestion is to consider changing the port to 80 as any regular
web service if there are not technical reasons for not doing it.
I understand that the translators have a problem with the port 32300.
Currently, the Pootle server is in sunvirtuallab and unfortunately, the
port 80 is already used for TCM. I'm afraid that it's not easy to switch
port 32300 to 80.
I think about an workaround. How about if they download the files from
Pootle where they can access Pootle and work off-line? Once translation
is completed, they can upload the contents.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Aijin
Pootle can also run on a part of the URL. Is it possible to allocate
part of the URL on port 80 to Pootle? For example
sunvirtuallab.com/pootle/.....
For allocation on port 80, we need to move Pootle to another machine.
Currently, the port 32300 on sunvirtuallab is redirected to a port on
the Pootle server machine while the port 80 is redirected to another
machine.
I'm not sure if it is possible to allocate a part of port 80 to Pootle.
Even if it's possible, we should think about the effect of moving.
I'll ask to sunvirtuallab admin if there is any solution.
Thanks,
Aijin
You will probably need to configure the web server to delegate the
requests, but if the infrastructure allows, this could perhaps work.
Keep well
Friedel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
