Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: > Hi Eike, > > Eike Rathke wrote: >> >> I guess that for building a language pack the OOo source tree would not >> be needed anymore, except maybe a few modules, is still a wish for the >> far future? > > MBA had the idea to move also all resource source files into a own > module but we first need to discuss this a bit further ....
This is a very reduced version of my idea. :-) We have to balance two requirements: developers working on e.g. a dialog may want to keep the english resources in their code module (this has to be clarified). OTOH developers building language packs would welcome to get rid of the source trees. There is a possible and clean way to fulfil both requirements, but it would require some coding work: we could keep the resouces in the source tree, but change the resource system in a way that the localized versions don't contain complete resources but only the strings. At runtime the code then will always load the english resource and mergers in all localized strings. Another potential benefit: we could get rid of the sdf format here and move to e.g. po files (or any other format that the localization community might prefer). But we have to find out if the gained flexibility is worth the effort. or if there are other, better ways to make all people happy. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[email protected]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
