Frank
I congratulate and thank you for all the efforts to bring pottle to OOo,
and the OOo technical (Iv, Rafaella, et al) team to implement pootle
into the translation process.
Those of us in the past who worked with sdf files, gsicheck, and issue
management related to translations handout know how hard it was to
deliver our work to the development team, notably and the ping-pong of
flawed sdf files in Issuezilla, not to mention that a simple linguistic
improvement or correction was a pain in the neck to get through the
final release. Most of us have limited skills and time to address such
technicalities and the Rafaella's deadlines were just frightening.
What a breeze today...
Olivier
Em 06-05-2010 13:18, F Wolff escreveu:
Op Do, 2010-05-06 om 10:36 +0200 skryf Ivo Hinkelmann:
Hi,
Hi everybody!
On 05.05.2010 10:41, Frank Mau wrote:
Hi,
after the outage of one of our pootle-instances and the limitation of
the other two ones, we see a pressing need to buy new hardware with a
new version of Pootle 2.x.
a fast and new machine combined with the new pootle version would be
really helpfull! The current state of the pootle services is bad.
Pootle 2.0 will work much better than the current version. We developed
it with the scale of OOo in mind.
In our mind is a quad-core machine (x86) with>2.x GHz and 8 or 16 GB
RAM. To host all languages on one big machine, the disk space should be
1 TB for each of the two harddisks.
that disk also fit well for hosting the latest l10n builds in all variants!
I'm sure everyone is excited about these possibilities! We will work
with Ivo and Frank to get the best performance for Pootle out of the
hardware. Pootle 2.0 is really much improved.
This solution should fit into our future l10n-scenario: Short
update-times for the pootle-service, early localized builds, continuous
localization.
Hope this fits for pootle and our requirements for OOo-localizations.
Any suggestions? Let's improve our OpenOffice.org for a larger community
:-)
Cheers,
Frank
and hopefully we can switch back to file merge instead of file upload!
This would improve the security and I don't have to delete any misplaced
l10n zips ;)
Cheers,
Ivo
I think we'll be able to go back to merging, yes. But even if we don't:
language administrators can do some of their own file management with
Pootle 2, so hopefully this will already mean less work for you :-)
Pootle 2.0 also allows a complete file to be uploaded as suggestions for
teams that prefer that as part of their workflow.
Pootle 2.0 brings a lot of improvements, not only to performance and
scalability, but also things like the quality checks, easier permissions
and account management, and useful information in news feeds.
We are already working on Pootle 2.1 with several improvements to the
online translation and review interface. We also want to make it easier
for teams to manage their terminology work. Stay tuned!
Thank you Ivo and Frank for your hard work on improving Pootle at OOo!
Friedel
--
Recently on my blog:
http://translate.org.za/blogs/friedel/en/content/virtaal-060-released
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
