[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16353417#comment-16353417
]
Hudson commented on LENS-1468:
------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1458 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Lens-Commit/1458/])
LENS-1468: Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten
(raju.bairishetti: rev 2772efb275742eb4c03da5e7635bdbcfab63cebc)
* (edit)
lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidateHQLContext.java
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/cubes/derived/der2.xml
* (edit)
lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/UnionQueryWriter.java
* (edit)
lens-cube/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/TestBaseCubeQueries.java
* (edit)
lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/ExpressionResolver.java
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/cubes/base/basecube.xml
> Expressions in having clauses are not getting rewritten properly for join
> queries
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LENS-1468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1468
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
> Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
> Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7
>
> Attachments: LENS-1468.01.patch, LENS-1468.02.patch
>
>
> The issue is not seen in test cases yet since somehow the order of child
> candidates in {{JoinCandidate}} has been fixed. We have observed the order
> being non-deterministic in production. And in one ordering, having clause
> works fine and in another it doesn't. Will be adding test cases to reproduce
> this issue and the fix as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
