-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68520/#review208339
-----------------------------------------------------------




lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/CubeFactTable.java
Lines 98 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68520/#comment292195>

    Can these be derived from existing non-time partition columns instead of 
new property being added?


- Amareshwari Sriramadasu


On Sept. 5, 2018, 2:55 a.m., Rajashekhar Choukimath wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68520/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 5, 2018, 2:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens, Amareshwari Sriramadasu, Ankit Kailaswar, and 
> Rajitha R.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-1533
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1533
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> LENS-1533: Adding support for Partition Columns to queried without giving 
> additional xml tag valid.columns
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/CubeFactTable.java 
> 8f3f4aa 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/CubeMetastoreClient.java
>  e6afcff 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/CubeVirtualFactTable.java
>  96948cc 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/FactTable.java 
> e351d7f 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/JAXBUtils.java 
> 7dfb166 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/MetastoreUtil.java 
> 44411f2 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java 
> 193ce6b 
>   
> lens-cube/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/cube/metadata/TestCubeMetastoreClient.java
>  6f054c4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68520/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Done on Local Test VM.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rajashekhar Choukimath
> 
>

Reply via email to