Hi,

Thanks for quick response.

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:59 AM, amareshwarisr . <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for reaching out Vikas. As Rajat and Jaideep mentioned, the feature
> you are asking for already exists. You can set
> lens.metastore.native.db.name
> and lens.metastore.native.table.name as the table properties and
> JDBCDriver
> replaces them in the query rewrite.
>
> See the example at
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-lens/blob/master/lens-examples/src/main/resources/city_subset.xml
> which is specifying the db name.
>
> Thanks
> Amareshwari
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Jaideep Dhok <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vikas,
> >
> > As Rajat mentioned JDBC driver can add a dbname.table name.
> >
> > You can check these two propertie which have to be set in the Storage
> table
> > -
> > lens.metastore.native.db.name
> > lens.metastore.native.table.name
> >
> > Relevant code - ColumnarSQLRewriter. replaceWithUnderlyingStorage
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jaideep
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Rajat Khandelwal <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We can add a driver level config option for jdbc driver. And have jdbc
> > > driver rewrite using that.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:53 PM Vikas Singh (Tech - VS) <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Problem Statement:
> > > >       For JDBC datastores i.e. Vertica we are facing problem
> regarding
> > > > schema name resolution. As the actual table against which query will
> be
> > > > fired will be <schema_name>.<table_name>. In lens there is no concept
> > of
> > > > schema and I guess directly it's not possible to incorporate a "."
> > (DOT)
> > > as
> > > > table name since Hive does't support dotted names.
> > > >
> > > > Proposed Workaround:
> > > >       - Adding a property schemaName as part of FactTable and
> > DimTables,
> > > > which will contain fully resolved table name.
> > > >       - Doing a query rewrite for schema name at the JDBC driver
> level.
> > > >
> > > > Please give your thoughts around this approach. Or if there is any
> > > existing
> > > > approach to support schema name resolutions.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Vikas Singh
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > Jaideep Dhok
> >
> > --
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for
> the
> > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
> privileged
> > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> notified
> > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in
> reliance
> > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete
> transmission
> > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in
> its
> > receipt.
> >
>

Reply via email to