> On April 21, 2015, 11:12 a.m., Raju Bairishetti wrote: > > src/site/apt/releases/release-history.apt, line 26 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33390/diff/1/?file=937503#file937503line26> > > > > Can we have **2.1.0-incubating docs** instead of 2.1.x-incubating docs?
With link put as 2.1.x, we need not update again if we roll more candidates for the release. Though the version number and vesions directory needs change, if a new candidate is rolled - could not figure out a way to avoid this. Usually, we will be doing only one release from 2.1.x, unless there needs to be a patch release from 2.1 line, where the full version needs to be updated. - Amareshwari ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33390/#review80942 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 21, 2015, 8:59 a.m., Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/33390/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 21, 2015, 8:59 a.m.) > > > Review request for lens, Rajat Khandelwal and Srikanth Sundarrajan. > > > Bugs: LENS-505 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-505 > > > Repository: lens > > > Description > ------- > > - Updated download page > - Updated release history table > - Documented incompatible changes in release history page. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/site/apt/releases/download.apt b18b3e5 > src/site/apt/releases/release-history.apt 959ef82 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33390/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran mvn site:run locally and verified doc is fine. > > > Thanks, > > Amareshwari Sriramadasu > >
