Thanks All. I was little concerned that I broke the build in my very first
patch :)

Regards

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Rajat Khandelwal <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This is not because of your patch. Existing bug in TimePartition class.
> Specifically for Update Period Quarterly. It was missed earlier because all
> the test cases were written in April(1st month of the quarter) :D.
>
> Don't worry about it, it will be fixed in a short while. I already have a
> fix.
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:39 PM Arshad Matin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > It is failing for us also. There is a JIRA raised for the same
> > JIRA : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-534
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Yash Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > > Is anyone else stumbling across this failure. I see this has been
> > > introduced yesterday after my patch merged in.
> > >
> > > I would like to help on this if my patch caused this someway.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > testTimeRange(org.apache.lens.cube.metadata.TestTimePartition)  Time
> > > elapsed: 0.005 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> > > java.lang.AssertionError: expected [10] but found [9]
> > > at org.testng.Assert.fail(Assert.java:94)
> > > at org.testng.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:494)
> > > at org.testng.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:123)
> > > at org.testng.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:265)
> > > at org.testng.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:275)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.lens.cube.metadata.TestTimePartition.testTimeRange(TestTimePartition.java:112)
> > >
> >
> > --
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for
> the
> > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
> privileged
> > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> notified
> > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in
> reliance
> > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete
> transmission
> > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in
> its
> > receipt.
> >
>

Reply via email to