On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 13:03, Jann Forrer wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > > > Rolf Kulemann wrote: > > > > > That people think that the UNSTABLE (1.4) trunk should be used in > > > production, is a bit crazy. Projects, which decide to use our as > > > unstable decalared trunk in production should switch there project > > > managers or at least there development strategy. > > > > > > Only official releases should used in production. > > > > i disagree, because that presents a chicken & egg situation. without the > > university of zurich going live with 1.2 early for example, it would not > > have settled into stability the same way. only production brings out the > > obscure issues.. > > > > This is true and we use 1.2.X just now (and not 1.2.2) but this a somehow > unsatisfying situation because we would favor to be based on a official > release (but 1.2.0 had some bugs which were fixed on 1.2.X).
Sorry, but it seems you mixed 1.2.0 and 1.2.2. IMHO 1.2.2 is much more improved than 1.2.0. AND, from 1.2.0 on we tried to release on a 2 month basis, which is hard but seems to work, if someone feels responsible. > Probably > the use of a svn version in production has something to do with the age > of the project. What do you mean? > Or can your imagine to download a svn version of the > apache httpd server to use it in production? Never! That is exactly what I wanted to say, but the comparison between Lenya and Apache Web Server is a bit unfair :) -- Rolf Kulemann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
