Michael Wechner wrote:
The basic question is if we need a configurable doctype-based creation polymorphism. IMO we don't - it is not too hard to implement something like that in a publication. This would be more flexible, and would probably allow better mechanisms than the current parameter map.
+1
doctypes can be wildly different, and there is no way to anticipate method signatures to cover all doctypes beyond the useless array of parameters we have today
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
