On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:26 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Michael Wechner wrote: > > Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > > > >> Michael Wechner wrote: > >> > >>> did you base it on 1.4-dev? Did you use views? Yes, I think it would > >>> be good to have the PDF link > >> > >> > >> > >> 1.2. > > > > > > > > ok > > > >> not sure what you mean with views, > > > > > > > > cocoon views: <map:views>... > > That would mean request parameters, wouldn't it? > I'd rather discourage this solution: > > - no static export possible > - PDFs should probably be addressed via the extension .pdf >
+1 I am the same opinion. -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
