On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 16:05 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > simon litwan wrote: > > hi list > > > > i'm working on a customers request about losing jobs after paste/rename > > url. they wish the scheduled jobs should move with document. but they > > also would be satisfied with a warning on the paste/rename screen that > > the jobs will get lost. > > [...] > > That's a good example for a problem caused by mixing concerns - > document storage and site structure. If they were separated, the > problem would not occur. I suggest that we reconsider storing documents > in a non-structured way and implement site structures as views on the > document repository. >
Like I understand the problem: simon wants to move the documents and it would be best that the associated jobs as well would be moved, right? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103992708800001&r=1&w=2 When linking the docs in jobs.xml with input modules then that is possible. I agree with Andreas that we should implement site structures as views on the document repository. salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
