Michael Wechner wrote:
J. Wolfgang Kaltz wrote:
Michael Wechner schrieb:
(...)
it seems to me that consensus is being found, because it seems to me
that
I am the only one who wants JCR integration.
As I tried to explain yesterday, we have been following a top-down
approach and have in fact already spent a lot of development time
towards making Lenya compatible with an alternative backend such as
JCR. You might recall, for example, the long discussions concerning
the changes in the document creation API, which were triggered by the
work towards a repository. So not only is that kind of work
non-trivial, but also requires perseverance. So saying you are the
only one interested in JCR work is, quite frankly,
I am not saying I am the only interested in, but the only one voting +1
to insert JCR right now, or did miscount something?
I would give my +1 to JCR in 1.4 if it follows Andreas' polymorphic
approach or Wolfgang's top-down approach (From my understanding, both
approaches are the same and are current goals in the 1.4 release).
JCR integration is something that I am very interested in, and am
looking forward to.
I would hate to see the current stability of 1.4 thrown out the door by
introducing JCR in the bottom-up approach that Wolfgang described. I
don't know about others, but this would certainly disrupt my plans for
lenya 1.4.
Publication templating and the 1.4 usecase model are the reasons that I
am planning on rolling with 1.4 for a large scale rollout. I am
assuming that moving my publications to JCR will be relatively painless.
--Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
