> it's not a forrest requirement. documents need to be in svn for easy > recovery in the course of a system failure. lenya/forrest therefore need > a way to write to svn.
Why is it easier to restore a SVN repository than it would be to restore a JCR repository; maybe with a filesystem backend? > Torsten Schlabach wrote: >>> But doco could be quite interesting from a community point of view as >>> well >>> ... >> >> Sure. It would add a lot of credibility if Lenya could finally eat its >> own >> dogfood. And even more, if other Apache projects would use Apache Lenya >> to >> edit their sites. But why don't (didn't) we convince Forrest to render >> off >> JCR instead of a SVN export. (IIRC they cannot really work directly on >> SVN, can they?) And why is it taken for granted that Apache websites >> have >> to render with Forrest at all? What value does Forrest add in the >> process >> compared to just taking Lenya. It could still be XDoc though. >> >> (I know this a bit provocative to the Forrest guys. Don't want to step >> on >> anyones toes! But I ask myself that question.) > > it's not a forrest requirement. documents need to be in svn for easy > recovery in the course of a system failure. lenya/forrest therefore need > a way to write to svn. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
