Hello devs, we had a discussion (more the start of it) over on the PMC list. It is about electing new committer and PMC members. Please read the following thread and all the answers before you bother to answer. ;-)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112264416700003&r=1&w=2 This same discussion we had over in forrest land and the result have been that forrest do not see right now the need for simple committership. With the result that all new voted committer are right away PMC members. In the above mentioned thread you will find my stand point of this issue but I have to admit that some answer convinced me to give up my initial standpoint. Over time, lenya created a "simple committer" role used as a step between being a developer and a PMC member. I actually would see that we elect committer/PMC member the same way e.g. forrest is doing it. Nicola said in above thread: "If we want to include "simple committership" as a role, I would like to hear someone explain how simple committership will solve more issues than it may cause, especially given the above. In particular, I would like to have some real-life examples that show how simple committership would have been useful." opinions? salu2 p.s.: pmc members, if you repeat your answers, remember not to copy any content of private mails here! -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
