El lun, 30-01-2006 a las 16:55 +0100, J. Wolfgang Kaltz escribió: > Andreas Hartmann schrieb: > > Felix Röthenbacher schrieb: > > > >> Hi Andreas > >> > >> I noticed (apart from some formatting changes) that you extended the > >> document info module with the possibility to get the document's > >> visibility in navigation. I wonder if that's the right place as document > >> visibility is dependent on the chosen navigation. > > > > > > Is this really the case? In the repo draft, I assigned the navigation > > visibility to the content node - > > That actually doesn't follow from the repository-api.pdf - or do you > mean another figure ? > > > IMO the general classification as > > "visible" or "hidden" is rather a property of the content item and > > should apply to all navigations. > > In the above-mentioned class diagram, I would expect this property to be > an attribute of the class SiteNode. > > IMO visibility is navigation-dependent, and not content-dependent (so I > agree with Felix here). Consider content reuse. If I use the same > content piece in two places, maybe I want it to have a visible > navigation entry in one place, but not in the other. Or, I have > different navigations, depending on the type of user. Or, ... > > WDYT ? >
Yeah, I fully agree with Wolfgang and Felix. Content should be usable in x pubs. It can be visible in one and in the other not. Further in different output format content can be suppressed because you would not need it. salu2 > > -- > Wolfgang > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
