On 2/3/06, Bob Harner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In Lenya1.2: > > "Assets" is the GUI name for additional data files. > > > > "Resources" is the file system directory name for "Assets". It was > > only seen by developers, and was never defined well. The directory > > name should disappear in Lenya1.4 if the Assets are moved to the > > repository. I like Resource as the superclass for Documents and > > Assets. > > > > "Content Item" implies an "Item" of "Content". 1.2's "Content" > > contained "Documents", so "Content Item" is an alternate name for a > > "Document". > > Did 1.2's "Content" really only contain "Documents"? I guess I > consider "Content" a more general, inclusive term than you do, so to > me it fits the need very well. Lenya is a "content management system" > after all, not a "resource management system".
In Lenya 1.2, "content" was the name of the directory containing the documents, but the same argument that "resources" was only a directory name and never seen by editors applies. /pub/resources/document /pub/resources/asset The superclass is "Resource". /pub/content/document /pub/content/asset The superclass is "Content Item" As much as I dislike using two words where one is sufficient, I agree a CMS should use the word "content" somewhere. Although our marketing could use "Lenya is more than a Content Management System; it is also a Resource Management System." That means nothing but could influence business managers. Andreas prefers "Content Item". Bob dislikes "Resource". I will accept either. Anybody else have a preference? solprovider --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
