Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
[...]
One thing, though: It isn't clear to me whether Jörn and Solprovider
really agree on what a Document is. Jörn seems to be using Document
as the aggregate/container term for both the editable text and the
assets of a page. But Solprovider seems to be suggesting the words
Resource or Content for that purpose.
now that you say it, you are right. i had read solprovider's remark
the way i wanted it to read :(
A little off topic, but I'd like to state my opinion once more:
The concept of "the editable text and the assets of a page" should be
dropped. Textual documents and (binary) assets should be equally handled
items in a flat storage.
++votes.
how do you like my terminology proposal in the wiki?
i'm suggesting to use "document" as the thing that is composed of
assets, where assets are "text assets" (can be in different languages),
and image or other media assets (with the same properties).
--
"Open source takes the bullshit out of software."
- Charles Ferguson on TechnologyReview.com
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier, EDV-Administrator
Institut für Politikwissenschaft
Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Duisburg
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Telefon: 0203/379-2736
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
