Andreas Hartmann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I mostly agree to that, but IMO changing an existing definition
is OK if it helps conforming to points 0 and 1. As I understand it,
the term "asset" is commonly used by other CMS (please correct me
if I'm wrong).
in this case, re-defining "asset" might even be beneficial for lenya 1.2
users, because the new paradigm that "everything is an asset" is a
generalization of the old asset concept. users must understand this
change anyway, regardless of name, and changing the meaning of the old
term shows how the old concept is broadened to include XML documents as
well. of course, it's all a matter of documentation.
--
"Open source takes the bullshit out of software."
- Charles Ferguson on TechnologyReview.com
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier, EDV-Administrator
Institut für Politikwissenschaft
Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Duisburg
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Telefon: 0203/379-2736
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
