Michael Wechner wrote:
[...]
Also if the UUID is used within the sitetree and done as Andreas
describes it within his
email then I don't think I have a problem with it, because the suffix
could be a part of the UUID
That would mean either redundant information in the UUID
<uuid> ::= <unique-part> - <extension>
or that entirely different documents can share a "unique part"
12345-xml
12345-odt
I don't see any advantages if the extension is part of the UUID.
It is sufficient to store this information in the meta data.
(doesn't matter if this makes sense or not).
Why doesn't it matter?
But this doesn't seem to be
the case and I really don't understand
why this shouldn't be possible.
It is probably possible, but at the moment I see only
disadvantages (see above) ...
-- Andreas
--
Andreas Hartmann
Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
