Michael Wechner wrote:
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Hi Lenya devs,
to sum up the recent UUID discussion:
From my point of view, the next step would be to use UUIDs to
identify documents. That would mean that the default persistence
mechanism would store documents in a flat structure which would
look like this:
550e8400-e29b-11d4-a716-446655440000
550e8400-e29b-11d4-a716-446655440000.meta
is 550e8400-e29b-11d4-a716-446655440000 (without suffix meta) the
actual content? I guess you are refering to the reference to the resource,
right?
It would be the name of the file which contains the actual content.
550e8400-e29b-11d4-a716-446655440231
550e8400-e29b-11d4-a716-446655440231.meta
550e8400-e29b-11d4-a716-446655443402
550e8400-e29b-11d4-a716-446655443402.meta
Do you share this opinion?
if we are talking about a default persistance manager then yes, but
if this would be hardcoded, then no ;-)
The question is if the persistence manager should get any
information apart from the UUID. If only the UUID is provided,
there won't be a chance to use human-readable file names.
If not, how do you envision the storage structure?
I am not sure if we are confusing actual storage with referencing?
well, in order to show what I think how it should be implemented I have
started
something at http://svn.wyona.com/repos/public/yanel/trunk
whereas it's not quite working yet and also got distracted on versioned
published interfaces ... I have done this because I am afraid I will
never be able to explain my ideas, so I will try to let this code speak.
OK, I'll take a look at it as soon as I find the time.
Thanks for your reply,
-- Andreas
--
Andreas Hartmann
Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
