Hi Lenya devs, IMO the UUID issue is quite important regarding the upcoming 1.4 release, and I'm very interested in your opinions about this topic.
I can see the following options, would you mind adding your +1 to one of them or add another one? 1) We should release 1.4 without UUIDs, the issue is to complex and should be discussed in detail later on. 2) We should introduce UUIDs in a straightforward manner: - sitetree references documents using UUIDs - the persistence layer knows only about UUIDs - the default persistence impl. uses UUID+language as filename - links are resolved when a page is rendered 3) The concept of paths should be kept. URLs are mapped to paths, i.e. the sitetree contains path references. The URL space might change, the path space might not (otherwise we would still be moving documents around, which is IMO a bad thing). 4) It should be in 1.4, but I don't like options (2) and (3). IMO it should be implemented like this: ... ---- Another issue: UUIDs vs. UNIDs Do you prefer a) UUIDs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUID) b) Lenya-specific UNIDs which might be human-readable Thanks a lot in advance! -- Andreas -- Andreas Hartmann Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
