El mar, 13-06-2006 a las 17:52 +0200, Andreas Hartmann escribió: > Jann Forrer wrote: > > Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> Hi Lenya devs, > >> > >> IMO the UUID issue is quite important regarding the upcoming 1.4 release, > >> and I'm very interested in your opinions about this topic. > >> > >> I can see the following options, would you mind adding your +1 > >> to one of them or add another one? > >> > >> > >> 1) We should release 1.4 without UUIDs, the issue is to complex > >> and should be discussed in detail later on. > >> > > > > +1 > > > > At the moment I can not estimate how complex it really is but it seems > > important to me that 1.4 is realeased as soon as possible. The UUID can > > be planned for a next release e.g. 1.4.1. However in that case it has to > > be backward compatible. > > It will probably not be backwards-compatible, since there will be > changes to the API and to the content structure. Actually I think that > the impact on the code base is rather large, and that it shouldn't > be scheduled for 1.4.1 but rather for 1.4 or 1.6. What do the others > think?
I am really not sure. We need to release 1.4 now as long we have this momentum. UUIDs will change the API. Meaning that current projects need to be ported to this changes. I think we should talk about blockers, resolve them and do a 1.4.1 release. I hope that many committer will review the 1.3 revolution and then we should start a 1.5 branch where we take the best from 1.3 and 1.4 and add all new features that are still missing 1.4. 1.4 is way too long in development then to have radical changes since this means all 1.4. projects that are already in production would have to be ported. salu2 > > -- Andreas > > > > If that can not be granted i will vote for > > option 2. > > > >> > >> 2) We should introduce UUIDs in a straightforward manner: > >> > >> - sitetree references documents using UUIDs > >> - the persistence layer knows only about UUIDs > >> - the default persistence impl. uses UUID+language as filename > >> - links are resolved when a page is rendered > >> > >> > >> 3) The concept of paths should be kept. URLs are mapped to paths, > >> i.e. the sitetree contains path references. The URL space > >> might change, the path space might not (otherwise we would > >> still be moving documents around, which is IMO a bad thing). > >> > >> > >> 4) It should be in 1.4, but I don't like options (2) and (3). > >> IMO it should be implemented like this: > >> ... > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> Another issue: UUIDs vs. UNIDs > >> > >> Do you prefer > >> > >> a) UUIDs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUID) > >> > > > > +1 > > > >> b) Lenya-specific UNIDs which might be human-readable > >> > >> > > Jann > > -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
