Hamish Cunningham wrote:

I think a lot of open source project ship ANT files, because of the
difficulty of setting things up to work with default installations. Our
GATE system does this (http://gate.ac.uk/).

I don't think its an issue worth spending much time/effort on?


agreed, whereas I have to admit that we need to think about something to
solve the Java 1.5  - 1.4 backwards compatibility issue.

Michi


Just my 0.00002 euros...

Best,

Hamish

--
Dr. Hamish Cunningham
Senior Research Scientist
Department of Computer Science
University of Sheffield
Regent Court
211 Portobello St.
Sheffield  S1 4DP
United Kingdom
http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~hamish/



Antonio Gallardo wrote:

Jörn Nettingsmeier escribió:

Michael Wechner wrote:

Andreas Hartmann wrote:

Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:

[...]

btw, why do we ship class files in svn?



because these classes are considered as tools. Do you want to ship Lenya with the ant java sources and first build ant?!



ok, that's an argument, but it gets absurd pretty quick.


I agree. We don't have to store into the repository pre-compiled lenya ant task classes.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Michael Wechner
Wyona      -   Open Source Content Management   -    Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com                      http://lenya.apache.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+41 44 272 91 61


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to