El mar, 05-09-2006 a las 10:31 +0200, Andreas Hartmann escribió: > Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > > hi everyone! > > > > > > looking at thorsten's ac work i realized that we still have hierarchical > > "storage" for the policies. > > Do we want to protect URLs, or documents?
The problem that we have ATM is that even the ac is protecting URL/subtrees it still assumes to have an underlying document. ...or better the GUI is assuming it since the tab depends on the sitetree. > For example - if you exchange the document of a sitetree node (=URL), > should the policy be moved with the document, or stay attached to > the node? Good question, I think moving a "URL" you would probably update the ac as well (as default usecase). Still it would be nice to have a dialog that will ask whether or not to move. > > > although we have gotten rid of that for the > > content after the introduction of uuids, we still need to shuffle > > directories around for the ac "repository" whenever a user changes the > > sitetree. > > > > what's the plan to get rid of that? would it be feasible to integrate > > the url/subtree policies into the sitetree? it would be nice to debug > > (everything in one place), and we can lose the horrible directory > > structure... > > I wouldn't add specific elements / attributes to the site structure. > How about site node meta data? > Hmm, that's brings it back to what we have now. That is why I asked to have something like sitetree-ac.xml where we store the ac in a tree. wdyt? salu2 > > -- Andreas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thorsten Scherler COO Spain Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
