simon litwan wrote: >>> to collaborate on this module we could provide space on wyona svn repo >>> until the lenya community would like to include this module in the lenya >>> repo. >>> >>> WDYT joern? >> sure, we can do that. but since it's non-intrusive except for the >> usecase view patch, we could develop it in the lenya repo directly - >> that would get us more testers and make the stuff visible. > > i'm not sure if there is a consensus on add module after module to the > repo.
can't remember any discussion about this lately... i just thought that since fckeditor is in, there would be no objections to tinymce either (both have the problem that the editor code itself cannot be shipped with lenya). personally, i don't think the problem is too many modules, but broken modules... granted, each module puts an extra maintenance burden on the lenya devs, but since bxe does not cut the mustard for many users, having alternatives is a good thing imho. as long as they are being maintained, that is. > an other idea may introducing a additional module repository to the > lenya repo. > i have no idea how if it would be possible for asf to allow a kind of > subprojects to a project. like modules would be. but i could imagin to > have commiters for just a module. > that could be like an entry point to become a lenyacommiter. -- "I don't need backups. I need restore!" - Trad. -- Jörn Nettingsmeier, EDV-Administrator Institut für Politikwissenschaft Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Duisburg Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Telefon: 0203/379-2736 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
